![]() ![]() "This program has gotten better every year for the past thirty years and I couldn't live without it now!" I use mostly the real tracks and very little of midi." Has been great for writing songs, practice and jamming. One of the best musical investments I've made. ![]() "I've had Band-in-a-Box for past 5 years. Wow - we've been receiving some great feedback from Band-in-a-Box® users! 40-ish years ago I was using clunky barely-usable sequencers, and now I have PC writing music for me. Followed soon by Texture by Roger Powell, though to me it was not as intuitive as Cakewalk so after buying it at a show and having Roger sign the package, I barely used it. Man I had Cakewalk 1.0 back right after Greg Hendershott started Twelve Tone Systems. I rarely leave Real Band anymore because it is all the DAW I need, especially when I can use the Twelve Tone/Cakewalk/Sonar/BandLabs plugins. I am not deep enough into DAWs these days to really get involved into the semantics of who owns what. I only use Sonar so I have access to the plugins anyway. I used Cakewalk in the 80s as a DOS program, so to say "Bandlabs released the former Sonar Platinum software under its new name, Cakewalk" made me say "huh"? Band labs acquired Cakewalk when Gibson quit on it in 2018, so I don't know if it is right to say that BandLabs did much more than change the name on Sonar to Cakewalk By Bandlab. That chronology sent me running to Google. As one who tends to look at things from every angle, isn't it a consideration to look at that statement from the other direction? That being why it was released with over 3,000 bugs? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |